This is a very interesting article, the most interesting one i have found during this research. the is that the multitude of channels and services has seen a depreciation of viewing satisfaction, using the Christmas period as a prime historical example of a time when family TV viewing was a huge occasion and many shows were shown, it has become less of a big deal, as instead of a concentration of viewings of a particular channel, multi media has dispersed this, hindered by the fact that there are in excess of 30% - 40% repeats being shown on TV compared to the quality original hyped programming particular to the Christmas period of yesteryear. The bottom line is money. Making original and memorable programming is a very expensive business, and commercial TV is dependent on advertising, so a more dispersed viewership across a multitude of channels and mediums means individual channels lose out on revenue from it, meaning they lack the funds necessary to fund new and original programming.
The basic take home message is that more is less.
So is Christmas TV a shadow of its former self?
Yes...
* Quite literally, nearly half of all the programmes on offer have been shown before
* Television is an industry in crisis, it's nave to expect the bold programming of the past
* With plenty of diverting content online, the TV set no longer dominates Christmas entertainment
No...
* We will still be watching shows in tens of millions, just not in the same room, and not just on TV sets
* Only a generation ago we were stuck with three channels, now many homes have hundreds to choose from
* What's not to like about being offered classic shows and more of them than ever before?